3d data design software Search Results


90
Amuza Inc bio 3d designer software
Bio 3d Designer Software, supplied by Amuza Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/pmc05953945-64-5-9?v=Amuza+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bio 3d designer software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc 3d design simulation software
3d Design Simulation Software, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/10__1088_slash_1757___899x_slash_1130_slash_1_slash_012028-90-3-0?v=ANSYS+inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d design simulation software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ANSYS inc 3d modeling software
3d Modeling Software, supplied by ANSYS inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/ppr0255160-82-7-10?v=ANSYS+inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d modeling software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Straumann GmbH 3d device design software
3d Device Design Software, supplied by Straumann GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/pmc11415297-32-10-16?v=Straumann+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d device design software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SolidWorks Corp 2015 premium cad 3 d design software
2015 Premium Cad 3 D Design Software, supplied by SolidWorks Corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/pmc05690532-186-28-34?v=SolidWorks+Corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2015 premium cad 3 d design software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc 3d x-ray microscopy data analysis
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
3d X Ray Microscopy Data Analysis, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/pmc10875706-173-0-7?v=GraphPad+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d x-ray microscopy data analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Innovmetric Software Inc 3d reconstructed polygonal mesh data vxelements
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
3d Reconstructed Polygonal Mesh Data Vxelements, supplied by Innovmetric Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/pmc07984490-97-7-20?v=Innovmetric+Software+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d reconstructed polygonal mesh data vxelements - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Intergraph Corporation 3d piping design software
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
3d Piping Design Software, supplied by Intergraph Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/10__54097_slash_f28dxz63-61-1-58?v=Intergraph+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d piping design software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
VAYTEK INC rendering software for a 3d volumetric regularly spaced, orthogonal grid data
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
Rendering Software For A 3d Volumetric Regularly Spaced, Orthogonal Grid Data, supplied by VAYTEK INC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/us08021300-189-5-0?v=VAYTEK+INC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rendering software for a 3d volumetric regularly spaced, orthogonal grid data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
TRUMPF GmbH 3d design software trutops
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
3d Design Software Trutops, supplied by TRUMPF GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/pmc06104501-52-9-13?v=TRUMPF+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d design software trutops - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Ansoft Corporation computer-aided design system maxwell 3d
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
Computer Aided Design System Maxwell 3d, supplied by Ansoft Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/10__1016_slash_s0016___5085_ascii40_07_ascii41_60009___2-13402-10-16?v=Ansoft+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
computer-aided design system maxwell 3d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Parametric Technology Corporation 3d design software pro/e
Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. <t>3D</t> X-ray <t>microscopy</t> images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).
3d Design Software Pro/E, supplied by Parametric Technology Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+data+design+software/pmc04837841-58-14-18?v=Parametric+Technology+Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d design software pro/e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. 3D X-ray microscopy images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

Journal: Hearing research

Article Title: Cochlear implant material effects on inflammatory cell function and foreign body response

doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108597

Figure Lengend Snippet: Intracochlear neo-ossification relative to platinum and PDMS bearing surfaces. 3D X-ray microscopy images of a single chronically implanted mouse cochlea (A,B,C) with the CI imaged in-situ were volumetrically segmented to compare the amount of neo-ossification in 3 separate areas: the area immediately adjacent to platinum electrode surfaces “Electrode” (red), the area adjacent to PDMS surfaces toward the backside of the electrode contact surface “Anti-electrode” (green), and the intracochlear portions basal to the E1 electrode “Non-electrode” (blue). Dashed lines in (A) denote the manual separation of the “Electrode” (red) and “Anti-electrode” (green) areas in which neo-ossification was volumetrically quantified and in (B,C) indicate the basal and apical limits confining the “Electrode” and “Anti-electrode” areas, with the “Non-electrode” area being basal to this area, stopping at the round window. “E1”, “E2” and “E3” denotes electrode contacts 1,2 and 3, respectively; “M” denotes modiolus; “RW” denotes the round window outlined by a red hashed circle in (B,C). The gray and dark yellow shading in (B) represent the open scala tympani space and areas of soft tissue fibrosis without neo-ossification, respectively. Mean quantification of volume of neo-ossification across n = 6 subjects with individual data points noted as dots and error bars representing 1 standard deviation is shown in (D). The greatest volume of neo-ossification was seen in the “Electrode” area immediately adjacent to the Platinum electrodes, followed by the “Anti-electrode” and “Non-electrode” areas, however these differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

Article Snippet: 3D X-ray microscopy data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism software (Graph-Pad Software, USA) via ordinary one-way ANOVA.

Techniques: Microscopy, In Situ, Standard Deviation